Claude Code leaderboards, compared
Ranking Claude Code usage has become a small genre of its own. The tools differ mainly on two axes: who sees the board (the public, or just your group) and how data gets there (manual submission, or automatic sync). Disclosure: ccclub is our project; descriptions of the others are based on their public docs as of July 2026.
The options
viberank โ a public community leaderboard. You sign in with GitHub and submit your usage (generated via ccusage); rankings by cost and tokens. Good if you want your numbers visible in a global community.
ccgather โ a public leaderboard and community with country-level stats. Same public model, more emphasis on community features.
tokenleaders โ a lightweight public Claude usage ranking; simple and fun rather than feature-heavy.
ccclub โ private-first. You create a group with npx ccclub init, friends join with a 6-letter code, and the board updates automatically from local logs (Claude Code session-end hook; background sync for Codex, OpenCode, Amp, pi-agent). No accounts. Each group gets a live web dashboard, and there's an opt-in global board if you do want a public ranking. Only numeric summaries are uploaded โ no prompts, code, or file paths.
Side by side
| viberank | ccgather | tokenleaders | ccclub | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audience | Public | Public | Public | Private group (opt-in global) |
| Account | GitHub | Sign-up | Varies | None |
| Data flow | Manual submission | Submission/sync | Submission | Automatic sync |
| Agents beyond Claude Code | Some | Claude-focused | Claude-focused | Codex, OpenCode, Amp, pi-agent |
| Web dashboard per group | โ | โ | โ | Yes |
How to choose
- Want the world to see your rank? viberank or ccgather โ that's exactly what they're for.
- Want a board for people you actually know? ccclub โ private groups with auto-sync were the design goal.
- Don't want a leaderboard at all? You may just want usage reports โ see how to check Claude Code usage or ccusage.
A fair caveat that applies to all of these, ours included: token count measures activity, not productivity. Leaderboards are for curiosity and fun โ treat them that way.
FAQ
What's the difference between viberank and ccclub?
viberank is a public community leaderboard you submit usage to (GitHub sign-in, data via ccusage). ccclub is private-first: a group of friends with an invite code, automatic sync from local logs, no accounts, plus an opt-in global board.
Do these leaderboards see my code or prompts?
They rank usage metadata, not content. ccclub uploads only numeric summaries (tokens, estimated cost, model names, turn counts) โ verifiable with ccclub show-data. For other tools, check their docs for what a submission includes.
Which leaderboard supports agents other than Claude Code?
ccclub tracks Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Amp, and pi-agent on one board and shows each member's agent mix. Most other leaderboards are Claude-focused.
Is a token leaderboard a good measure of productivity?
No โ it measures activity and spend, not output quality. These tools (ccclub included) are best treated as curiosity and friendly competition, not performance metrics.
Last updated 2026-07-07. Corrections welcome on GitHub.